Benjamin LaHaise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What about the use of atomic operations on frv? Are they more lightweight
> than a semaphore, making for a better fastpath?
What do you mean? Atomic ops don't compare to semaphores.
On FRV atomic ops don't disable interrupts; they reserve one of the eight
conditional execution flags at compile time and that flag is cleared by entry
to an exception, thus aborting the write instruction. See:
Documentation/fujitsu/frv/atomic-ops.txt
I could try and improve the fastpath on the semaphores for FRV - and perhaps
should - but I implemented the semaphores before I'd thought of the clever way
to do atomic ops.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/