3.16.7-ckt3 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> commit 91b57191cfd152c02ded0745250167d0263084f8 upstream. In some android devices, there will be a "divide by zero" exception. vmpr->scanned could be zero before spin_lock(&vmpr->sr_lock). Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88051 [a...@linux-foundation.org: neaten] Reported-by: ji_ang <ji_...@163.com> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton.voront...@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriq...@canonical.com> --- mm/vmpressure.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmpressure.c b/mm/vmpressure.c index d4042e75f7c7..c5afd573d7da 100644 --- a/mm/vmpressure.c +++ b/mm/vmpressure.c @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ static void vmpressure_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) unsigned long scanned; unsigned long reclaimed; + spin_lock(&vmpr->sr_lock); /* * Several contexts might be calling vmpressure(), so it is * possible that the work was rescheduled again before the old @@ -173,11 +174,12 @@ static void vmpressure_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) * here. No need for any locks here since we don't care if * vmpr->reclaimed is in sync. */ - if (!vmpr->scanned) + scanned = vmpr->scanned; + if (!scanned) { + spin_unlock(&vmpr->sr_lock); return; + } - spin_lock(&vmpr->sr_lock); - scanned = vmpr->scanned; reclaimed = vmpr->reclaimed; vmpr->scanned = 0; vmpr->reclaimed = 0; -- 2.1.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
