(2014/12/17 10:36), Lai Jiangshan wrote:
On 12/17/2014 12:45 AM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
With node online/offline, cpu<->node relationship is established.
Workqueue uses a info which was established at boot time but
it may be changed by node hotpluging.

Once pool->node points to a stale node, following allocation failure
happens.
   ==
      SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node 2 (gfp=0x80d0)
       cache: kmalloc-192, object size: 192, buffer size: 192, default
order:
     1, min order: 0
       node 0: slabs: 6172, objs: 259224, free: 245741
       node 1: slabs: 3261, objs: 136962, free: 127656
     ==
This patch updates per cpu workqueue pool's node affinity and
updates wq_numa_possible_cpumask at node online/offline event.
This update of mask is very important because it affects cpumasks
and preferred node detection.

Unbound workqueue's per node pool are updated by
by wq_update_unbound_numa() at CPU_DOWN_PREPARE of the last cpu, by existing 
code.
What important here is to avoid wrong node detection when a cpu get onlined.
And it's handled by wq_numa_possible_cpumask update introduced by this patch.

Changelog v3->v4:
  - added workqueue_node_unregister
  - clear wq_numa_possible_cpumask at node offline.
  - merged a patch which handles per cpu pools.
  - clear per-cpu-pool's pool->node at node offlining.
  - set per-cpu-pool's pool->node at node onlining.
  - dropped modification to get_unbound_pool()
  - dropped per-cpu-pool handling at cpu online/offline.

Reported-by:  Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
  include/linux/memory_hotplug.h |  3 +++
  kernel/workqueue.c             | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  mm/memory_hotplug.c            |  6 ++++-
  3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
index 8f1a419..7b4a292 100644
--- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
+++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
@@ -270,4 +270,7 @@ extern void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, 
struct mem_section *ms)
  extern struct page *sparse_decode_mem_map(unsigned long coded_mem_map,
                                          unsigned long pnum);

+/* update for workqueues */
+void workqueue_node_register(int node);
+void workqueue_node_unregister(int node);
  #endif /* __LINUX_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_H */
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 6202b08..f6ad05a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
  static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache;

  static cpumask_var_t *wq_numa_possible_cpumask;
-                                       /* possible CPUs of each node */
+                                       /* PL: possible CPUs of each node */

  static bool wq_disable_numa;
  module_param_named(disable_numa, wq_disable_numa, bool, 0444);
@@ -4563,6 +4563,62 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct 
worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
                WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
                                                  pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
  }
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
+
+static void workqueue_update_cpu_numa_affinity(int cpu, int node)
+{
+       struct worker_pool *pool;
+
+       if (node != cpu_to_node(cpu))
+               return;
+       cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);
+       for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
+               pool->node = node;

Again, You need to check and update all the wq->numa_pwq_tbl[oldnode],
but in this patchset, the required information is lost and we can't find out 
oldnode.


cpus of oldnode, 16-31(online),48,56,64,72(offline,randomly assigned to the 
oldnode by numa_init_array())

and then cpu#48 is allocated for newnode and online

Now, the wq->numa_pwq_tbl[oldnode]'s cpumask still have cpu#48, and it may be 
scheduled to cpu#48.
See the information of my patch 4/5


That will not cause page allocation failure, right ? If so, it's out of scope 
of this patch 1/2.

I think it's handled in patch 2/2, isn't it ?

Thanks,
-Kame




+}
+
+/*
+ * When a cpu is physically added, cpu<->node relationship is established
+ * based on firmware info. We can catch the whole view when a new NODE_DATA()
+ * coming up (a node is added).
+ * If we don't update the info, pool->node will points to a not-online node
+ * and the kernel will have allocation failure.
+ *
+ * Update wp_numa_possible_mask at online and clear it at offline.
+ */
+void workqueue_node_register(int node)
+{
+       int cpu;
+
+       mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+               workqueue_update_cpu_numa_affinity(cpu, node);
+       /* unbound workqueue will be updated when the 1st cpu comes up.*/
+       mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+}
+
+void workqueue_node_unregister(int node)
+{
+       struct worker_pool *pool;
+       int cpu;
+
+       mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+       cpumask_clear(wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);
+       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+               if (node == cpu_to_node(cpu))
+                       for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
+                               pool->node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+       }
+       /*
+        * unbound workqueue's per-node pwqs are already refleshed
+        * by wq_update_unbound_numa() at CPU_DOWN_PREPARE of the last cpu
+        * on this node, because all cpus of this node went down.
+        * (see wq_calc_node_cpumask()). per-node unbound pwqs has been replaced
+        * with wq->dfl_pwq, already.
+        */
+       mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+}
+
+#endif

  /*
   * Workqueues should be brought up before normal priority CPU notifiers.
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 9fab107..a0cb5c1 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1122,6 +1122,9 @@ static pg_data_t __ref *hotadd_new_pgdat(int nid, u64 
start)
         */
        reset_node_present_pages(pgdat);

+       /* Update workqueue's numa affinity info. */
+       workqueue_node_register(nid);
+
        return pgdat;
  }

@@ -1958,7 +1961,8 @@ void try_offline_node(int nid)

        if (check_and_unmap_cpu_on_node(pgdat))
                return;
-
+       /* update workqueue's numa affinity info. */
+       workqueue_node_unregister(nid);
        /*
         * all memory/cpu of this node are removed, we can offline this
         * node now.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to