On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Balbir Singh wrote: > >> Could you describe what this does to signing? I presume the patched >> module should cause a taint on module signing? > > Hmm, why should it? >
I wanted to clarify it from a different perspective If the base image is signed by X and the patched module is signed by Y, is that supported. What does it imply in the case of live-patching? Balbir Singh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
