On 17 December 2014 at 04:39, Dmitry Torokhov <d...@chromium.org> wrote: > Note that I am not happy with OPP code: dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table() is > wrong in it's assumption that taking RCU lock will guarantee that number of > OPPs will not change - we can remove OPP from list just fine, and then > initialization will fail. I also think that we shoudl change API so users > should > get a reference to their OPP table and then pass opaque dev_opp pointer to > accessor APIs instead of re-scanning the global list over and over and over.
Yeah, agree for both of them.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
