On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Dave Jones <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 01:22:41PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>
>  > I'm going to try your two patches on top of .18, with the same kernel
>  > config, and see where that takes us.
>  > Hopefully to happier places.
>
> Not so much.  Died very quickly.

Damn, damn, damn. That's because of a stupid typo on the patches. We
have these very similar variables ("flags" and "fault") that have very
similar fault information, but they are completely different.

The "fault & FAULT_FLAG_USER" test is wrong, it should test "flags &
FAULT_FLAG_USER". Patch attached.

The half-way good news is that this certainly confirms that trinity is
triggering the "page fault with fatal signal pending" special case.

                             Linus
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index b74a7e130b03..38dcec403b46 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ good_area:
                }
 
                /* User mode? Just return to handle the fatal exception */
-               if (fault & FAULT_FLAG_USER)
+               if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_USER)
                        return;
 
                /* Not returning to user mode? Handle exceptions or die: */

Reply via email to