> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Varlese, Marco
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 4:56 PM
> To: Roopa Prabhu
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; Fastabend, John R; Thomas Graf; Jiri Pirko;
> sfel...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
> configuration
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roopa Prabhu [mailto:ro...@cumulusnetworks.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 2:45 PM
> > To: Varlese, Marco
> > Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; Fastabend, John R; Thomas Graf; Jiri
> > Pirko; sfel...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: Support for switch port
> > configuration
> >
> > On 12/18/14, 3:29 AM, Varlese, Marco wrote:
> > > From: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Switch hardware offers a list of attributes that are configurable on
> > > a per port basis.
> > > This patch provides a mechanism to configure switch ports by adding
> > > an NDO for setting specific values to specific attributes.
> > > There will be a separate patch that adds the "get" functionality via
> > > another NDO and another patch that extends iproute2 to call the two
> > > new NDOs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/netdevice.h | 5 ++++
> > > include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 15 ++++++++++++
> > > net/core/rtnetlink.c | 54
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > index c31f74d..4881c7b 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > @@ -1027,6 +1027,9 @@ typedef u16 (*select_queue_fallback_t)(struct
> > net_device *dev,
> > > * int (*ndo_switch_port_stp_update)(struct net_device *dev, u8 state);
> > > * Called to notify switch device port of bridge port STP
> > > * state change.
> > > + * int (*ndo_switch_port_set_cfg)(struct net_device *dev,
> > > + * u32 attr, u64 value);
> > > + * Called to set specific switch ports attributes.
> > > */
> > > struct net_device_ops {
> > > int (*ndo_init)(struct net_device *dev);
> > > @@ -1185,6 +1188,8 @@ struct net_device_ops {
> > > struct
> > netdev_phys_item_id *psid);
> > > int (*ndo_switch_port_stp_update)(struct
> > net_device *dev,
> > > u8 state);
> > > + int (*ndo_switch_port_set_cfg)(struct
> > net_device *dev,
> > > + u32 attr, u64 value);
> > > #endif
> > > };
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> > > b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h index f7d0d2d..19cb51a 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> > > @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ enum {
> > > IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID,
> > > IFLA_CARRIER_CHANGES,
> > > IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID,
> > > + IFLA_SWITCH_PORT_CFG,
> > > __IFLA_MAX
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -603,4 +604,18 @@ enum {
> > >
> > > #define IFLA_HSR_MAX (__IFLA_HSR_MAX - 1)
> > >
> > > +/* Switch Port Attributes section */
> > > +
> > > +enum {
> > > + IFLA_ATTR_UNSPEC,
> > > + IFLA_ATTR_LEARNING,
> > Any reason you want learning here ?. This is covered as part of the
> > bridge setlink attributes.
> >
>
> Yes, because the user may _not_ want to go through a bridge interface
> necessarily.
Some bridge attributes or more accurately bridge port attributes overlap with
port attributes.
IFLA_BRPORT_LEARNING from IFLA_PROTINFO and BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID flag of
IFLA_BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO from IFLA_AF_SPEC are two examples where bridge port
properties might have to be mapped to a common or driver specific port
attribute.
Switch port driver that works without and explicit bridge device has to
implement the bridge NDO's ndo_bridge_setlink/ndo_bridge_dellink.
It could take care of mapping such attributes from the bridge netlink message
to either driver-specific port attribute of to an explicit one (assuming
IFLA_ATTR_LEARNING would be accepted).
For example the driver could process the bridge learning information from the
protinfo as such:
int sw_driver_br_setlink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
{
struct nlattr *protinfo;
protinfo = nlmsg_find_attr(nlh, sizeof(struct ifinfomsg),
IFLA_PROTINFO);
if (protinfo) {
struct nlattr *attr;
attr = nla_find_nested(protinfo, IFLA_BRPORT_LEARNING);
if (attr) {
if (nla_len(attr) >= sizeof(u8)) {
if (nla_get_u8(attr))
brport_flags |= BR_LEARNING;
else
brport_flags &= ~BR_LEARNING;
}
}
/*
* Map bridge port attributes to driver-specific port attributes
*/
}
return 0;
}
>
> > > + IFLA_ATTR_LOOPBACK,
> > > + IFLA_ATTR_BCAST_FLOODING,
> > > + IFLA_ATTR_UCAST_FLOODING,
> > > + IFLA_ATTR_MCAST_FLOODING,
> > > + __IFLA_ATTR_MAX
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define IFLA_ATTR_MAX (__IFLA_ATTR_MAX - 1)
> > > +
> > > #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_IF_LINK_H */ diff --git
> > > a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c index
> > > eaa057f..c0d1c45 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> > > @@ -1389,6 +1389,46 @@ static int validate_linkmsg(struct net_device
> > *dev, struct nlattr *tb[])
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV
> > > +static int do_setswcfg(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *attr) {
> > > + int rem, err = -EINVAL;
> > > + struct nlattr *v;
> > > + const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
> > > +
> > > + nla_for_each_nested(v, attr, rem) {
> > > + u32 op = nla_type(v);
> > > + u64 value = 0;
> > > +
> > > + switch (op) {
> > > + case IFLA_ATTR_LEARNING:
> > > + case IFLA_ATTR_LOOPBACK:
> > > + case IFLA_ATTR_BCAST_FLOODING:
> > > + case IFLA_ATTR_UCAST_FLOODING:
> > > + case IFLA_ATTR_MCAST_FLOODING: {
> > > + if (nla_len(v) < sizeof(value)) {
> > > + err = -EINVAL;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + value = nla_get_u64(v);
> > > + err = ops->ndo_switch_port_set_cfg(dev,
> > > + op,
> > > + value);
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + default:
> > > + err = -EINVAL;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + if (err)
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + return err;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > static int do_setvfinfo(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *attr)
> > > {
> > > int rem, err = -EINVAL;
> > > @@ -1740,6 +1780,20 @@ static int do_setlink(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV
> > > + if (tb[IFLA_SWITCH_PORT_CFG]) {
> > > + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > + if (!ops->ndo_switch_port_set_cfg)
> > > + goto errout;
> > > + if (!ops->ndo_switch_parent_id_get)
> > > + goto errout;
> > > + err = do_setswcfg(dev, tb[IFLA_SWITCH_PORT_CFG]);
> > > + if (err < 0)
> > > + goto errout;
> > > +
> > > + status |= DO_SETLINK_NOTIFY;
> > > + }
> > > +#endif
> > > err = 0;
> > >
> > > errout:
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body
> of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
