On Monday, December 22, 2014 07:14:56 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 December 2014 at 02:44, Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> wrote:
> > This platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by
> > the
> > driver core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de>
> > ---
> > Generated with coccinelle. SmPL file is in the introductory msg. The big
> > cleanup was pulled in this merge window. This series catches the bits fallen
> > through. The patches shall go in via the subsystem trees.
> >
> > drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c
> > index 25fbd6a1374f..f0913eee2f50 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ out:
> > static struct platform_driver ls1x_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "ls1x-cpufreq",
> > - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > },
> > .probe = ls1x_cpufreq_probe,
> > .remove = ls1x_cpufreq_remove,
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> --
OK
Wolfram, please feel free to push this through whatever tree you think is
appropriate.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
