On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 23/12/2014 01:39, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> This is a dramatic simplification and speedup of the vdso pvclock read
>> code.  Is it correct?
>>
>> Andy Lutomirski (2):
>>   x86, vdso: Use asm volatile in __getcpu
>>   x86, vdso, pvclock: Simplify and speed up the vdso pvclock reader
>
> Patch 1 is ok,
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>

Any thoughts as to whether it should be tagged for stable?  I haven't
looked closely enough at the old pvclock code or the generated code to
have much of an opinion there.  It'll be a big speedup for non-pvclock
users at least.

--Andy

>
> For patch 2 I will defer to Marcelo and Glauber (and the Xen folks).
>
> Paolo



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to