On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 01:56:29PM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote: > Let me correct my words. Main purpose of this patch 1/2 is handling a case > "node disappers" after boot. > And try to handle physicall node hotplug caes. > > Changes of cpu<->node relationship at CPU_ONLINE is handled in patch 2/2.
Can you please make numa code itself maintain the cpu to nodemask maps? Let's make workqueue a simple consumer of that and we don't have proper notification mechanism for node up/down events? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
