On 2 January 2015 at 10:27, Michael Büsch <m...@bues.ch> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jan 2015 02:34:01 -0500 > Nicholas Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This adds proper locking for the function, b43_op_beacon_set_tim in main.c >> by using the mutex lock >> in the structure pointer wl, as embedded into this pointer as a mutex in >> order to protect against >> multiple access to the pointer wl when updating the templates for this >> pointer in the function, >> b43_update_templates internally in the function, b43_op_beacon_set_tim. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c >> b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c >> index 47731cb..d568fc8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c >> @@ -5094,8 +5094,9 @@ static int b43_op_beacon_set_tim(struct ieee80211_hw >> *hw, >> { >> struct b43_wl *wl = hw_to_b43_wl(hw); >> >> - /* FIXME: add locking */ >> + mutex_lock(&wl->mutex); >> b43_update_templates(wl); >> + mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex); >> >> return 0; >> } > > Thanks for the patch. > > However, this does not work. We are in atomic context here. > Please see the b43-dev mailing list archives for a recent thread about that.
Michael: guess who it was who sent the patch doing the same back in November. Yes, the same troll. -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/