Hi, On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 10:40:49PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2015-01-04 21:26:59, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 04:20:57PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Jan 2015, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Nicolas Pitre > > > > <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It wasted a lot of people's time before by simply being there and > > > > > wrong > > > > > before it was removed. It's only a matter of whose time you want to > > > > > waste. Really. > > > > > > > > Really. Shut up. > > > > > > > > The whole "no regressions" thing is very much about the fact that we > > > > don't waste users time. > > > > > > I was talking about users time all along. > > > > > > Never mind. I'm sorry for the NAK and sorry for attempting to start a > > > discussion to find a better replacement. > > > > Nico, > > > > I encourage you *not* to back down like this. Linus is right in so far > > as the regressions issue, but he is *totally* wrong to do the revert, > > which IMHO has been done out of nothing more than spite. > > > > Either *with or without* the revert, the issue still remains, and needs > > to be addressed properly. > > > > With the revert in place, we now have insanely small bogomips values > > reported via /proc/cpuinfo when hardware timers are used. That needs > > fixing. > > Too bad 9fc2105aeaaf56b0cf75296a84702d0f9e64437b's changelog did not > mention that :-(. > > I see reasonable values on Nokia N900. Do I need to change my config > to see the problem, or should I try reproducing on socfpga board?
I believe Nokia boards fall into the "antique hardware" category, so for us using such HW the issue is not visible... A. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
