* Zou, Nanhai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>       We have seen the same oops on the same point.
> Can you point to me the URL where the patch is? 
> I am not sure which patch should I get.

I believe it's fixed in 2.6.11-ac, and we fixed it in the current stable
2.6.11.7 tree.  The following patch is what went into 2.6.11.7:
---

From: Stephen Tweedie
Subject: Prevent race condition in jbd

This patch from Stephen Tweedie which fixes a race in jbd code (it
demonstrated itself as more or less random NULL dereferences in the
journal code).

Acked-by: Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- linux-2.6-ext3/fs/jbd/transaction.c.=K0000=.orig
+++ linux-2.6-ext3/fs/jbd/transaction.c
@@ -1775,10 +1775,10 @@ static int journal_unmap_buffer(journal_
                        JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "checkpointed: add to BJ_Forget");
                        ret = __dispose_buffer(jh,
                                        journal->j_running_transaction);
+                       journal_put_journal_head(jh);
                        spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
                        jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
                        spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
-                       journal_put_journal_head(jh);
                        return ret;
                } else {
                        /* There is no currently-running transaction. So the
@@ -1789,10 +1789,10 @@ static int journal_unmap_buffer(journal_
                                JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "give to committing trans");
                                ret = __dispose_buffer(jh,
                                        journal->j_committing_transaction);
+                               journal_put_journal_head(jh);
                                spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
                                jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
                                spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
-                               journal_put_journal_head(jh);
                                return ret;
                        } else {
                                /* The orphan record's transaction has
@@ -1813,10 +1813,10 @@ static int journal_unmap_buffer(journal_
                                        journal->j_running_transaction);
                        jh->b_next_transaction = NULL;
                }
+               journal_put_journal_head(jh);
                spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
                jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
                spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
-               journal_put_journal_head(jh);
                return 0;
        } else {
                /* Good, the buffer belongs to the running transaction.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to