Hello Alexander,

I have other kind of problems with this patch...

With 2.6.12-rc2 + your patch, when I run OpenOffice (a 32-bit
application), I get this in dmesg :

Unable to handle kernel paging request at 00002aaaad9280b0 RIP: 
<ffffffff801f5d70>{__put_user_4+32}
PGD 0 
Oops: 0002 [1] SMP 
CPU 0 
Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand sch_sfq sch_htb ipt_CONNMARK
ipt_ipp2p ipt_connmark ipt_mark ipt_tos ipt_length ipt_MARK
iptable_filter iptable_mangle ip_tables powernow_k8 tun nvidia
snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_via82xx snd_ac97_codec snd_pcm snd_timer
snd_page_alloc snd_mpu401_uart snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device snd cx8800
v4l1_compat v4l2_common cx88xx i2c_algo_bit video_buf ir_common
btcx_risc tveeprom videodev tuner usbhid w83627hf i2c_sensor i2c_isa
i2c_core usb_storage uhci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore sd_mod scsi_mod
Pid: 11236, comm: soffice.bin Tainted: P      2.6.12-rc2
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff801f5d70>] <ffffffff801f5d70>{__put_user_4+32}
RSP: 0000:ffff81001d32fea0  EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000003 RBX: ffff8100255b0f70 RCX: 00002aaaad9280b0
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff810033534940 RDI: 00002aaaad9280b0
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff81001d32e000 R09: 0000000000000002
R10: ffff81001d32e000 R11: 00000000558740dc R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff810033534940 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  00002aaaae0ff820(0000) GS:ffffffff80489840(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00002aaaad9280b0 CR3: 0000000025150000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Process soffice.bin (pid: 11236, threadinfo ffff81001d32e000, task
ffff8100255b0f70)
Stack: ffffffff80133414 ffff810019f11138 ffff810033534940
ffff8100255b0f70 
       ffff8100255b0f70 0000000000000000 ffffffff80137c0a
0000000000000000 
       0000000000000000 ffff8100255b15a4 
Call Trace:<ffffffff80133414>{mm_release+116} <ffffffff80137c0a>{exit_mm
+42} 
       <ffffffff8013802f>{do_exit+351} <ffffffff80138b8c>{do_group_exit
+252} 
       <ffffffff80122ab1>{ia32_sysret+0} 

It is easily reproducible on my system, I just have to start and exit
OpenOffice 1.1.4.

I got similar messages with 2.6.12-rc3 + your patch (please tell me if
you also want these messages).
I also had one system freeze and one reboot (when I clicked on a link in
Firefox (32-bit app too), I don't know if it is related). But I was
unable to reproduce these crashes, so I'm not sure whether it is caused
by rc3 or by your patch.

Please note that these problems did not occur with 2.6.12-rc2 + these
patches reverted:
 - x86_64-give-out-of-line-get_user-better-calling.patch
 - x86_64-move-put_user-out-of-line.patch
 - x86_64-remove-stale-unused-file.patch

Best regards,

Nicolas

On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 01:10 +0200, Alexander Nyberg wrote: 
> The new out of line put_user() assembly on x86_64 changes %rcx without
> telling GCC about it causing things like:
> 
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4515 
> 
> See to it that %rcx is not changed (made it consistent with get_user()).
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Nyberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Index: test/arch/x86_64/lib/getuser.S
> ===================================================================
> --- test.orig/arch/x86_64/lib/getuser.S       2005-04-20 23:55:35.000000000 
> +0200
> +++ test/arch/x86_64/lib/getuser.S    2005-04-21 00:54:16.000000000 +0200
> @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@
>  __get_user_8:
>       GET_THREAD_INFO(%r8)
>       addq $7,%rcx
> -     jc bad_get_user
> +     jc 40f
>       cmpq threadinfo_addr_limit(%r8),%rcx
> -     jae     bad_get_user
> +     jae     40f
>       subq    $7,%rcx
>  4:   movq (%rcx),%rdx
>       xorl %eax,%eax
> Index: test/arch/x86_64/lib/putuser.S
> ===================================================================
> --- test.orig/arch/x86_64/lib/putuser.S       2005-04-21 00:50:24.000000000 
> +0200
> +++ test/arch/x86_64/lib/putuser.S    2005-04-21 01:02:15.000000000 +0200
> @@ -46,36 +46,45 @@
>  __put_user_2:
>       GET_THREAD_INFO(%r8)
>       addq $1,%rcx
> -     jc bad_put_user
> +     jc 20f
>       cmpq threadinfo_addr_limit(%r8),%rcx
> -     jae      bad_put_user
> -2:   movw %dx,-1(%rcx)
> +     jae 20f
> +2:   decq %rcx
> +     movw %dx,(%rcx)
>       xorl %eax,%eax
>       ret
> +20:  decq %rcx
> +     jmp bad_put_user
>  
>       .p2align 4
>  .globl __put_user_4
>  __put_user_4:
>       GET_THREAD_INFO(%r8)
>       addq $3,%rcx
> -     jc bad_put_user
> +     jc 30f
>       cmpq threadinfo_addr_limit(%r8),%rcx
> -     jae bad_put_user
> -3:   movl %edx,-3(%rcx)
> +     jae 30f
> +3:   subq $3,%rcx
> +     movl %edx,(%rcx)
>       xorl %eax,%eax
>       ret
> +30:  subq $3,%rcx
> +     jmp bad_put_user
>  
>       .p2align 4
>  .globl __put_user_8
>  __put_user_8:
>       GET_THREAD_INFO(%r8)
>       addq $7,%rcx
> -     jc bad_put_user
> +     jc 40f
>       cmpq threadinfo_addr_limit(%r8),%rcx
> -     jae     bad_put_user
> -4:   movq %rdx,-7(%rcx)
> +     jae 40f
> +4:   subq $7,%rcx
> +     movq %rdx,(%rcx)
>       xorl %eax,%eax
>       ret
> +40:  subq $7,%rcx
> +     jmp bad_put_user
>  
>  bad_put_user:
>       movq $(-EFAULT),%rax
> 
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to