From: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
---
 Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt 
b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index a10f7cd2619e..ca2387ef27ab 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ In summary:
       However, they do -not- guarantee any other sort of ordering:
       Not prior loads against later loads, nor prior stores against
       later anything.  If you need these other forms of ordering,
-      use smb_rmb(), smp_wmb(), or, in the case of prior stores and
+      use smp_rmb(), smp_wmb(), or, in the case of prior stores and
       later loads, smp_mb().
 
   (*) If both legs of the "if" statement begin with identical stores
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to