On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:27:38PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> The -o SUBSYS option doesn't exist. Jesus, at least get yourself > >> familiar with the basics before claiming random stuff. > > Oh let's see I got that command line option out of /proc/mounts and yes > it works. Perhaps it doesn't if I invoke unified hiearchies but the > option does in fact exist and work.
I meant the -o SUBSYS doesn't exist for unified hierarchy. > Now I really do need to test report regressions, and send probably send > regression fixes. If I understand your strange ranting I think you just > told me that option that -o SUBSYS does work with unified hierarchies. What? Why would -O SUBSYS exist for unified hierarchy? It's unified for all controllers. > Tejun. I asked you specifically about this case 2 years ago at plumbers > and you personally told me this would continue to work. I am going to > hold you to that. I have no idea what you're talking about in *THIS* thread. I'm fully aware of what was discussed *THEN*. > Fixing bugs is one thing. Gratuitious regressions that make supporting > existing user space applications insane is another. Can you explain what problem you're actually trying to talk about without spouting random claims about regressions? -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
