On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:08:42AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > From: Olliver Schinagl <oli...@schinagl.nl> > > The gpio document says we should not use unnamed bindings for gpios. > This patch uses the 'led-' prefix to the gpios and updates code and > documents. Because the devm_get_gpiod_from_child() falls back to using > old-style unnamed gpios, we can update the code first, and update > dts files as time allows. > > Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oli...@schinagl.nl> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.txt | 12 ++++++------ > drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.txt > index d544cf1..2c138cc 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-gpio.txt > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Each LED is represented as a sub-node of the gpio-leds > device. Each > node's name represents the name of the corresponding LED. > > LED sub-node properties: > -- gpios : Should specify the LED's GPIO, see "gpios property" in > +- led-gpios : Should specify the LED's GPIO, see "gpios property" in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt. Active low LEDs should be > indicated using flags in the GPIO specifier. > - label : (optional) > @@ -32,12 +32,12 @@ leds { > compatible = "gpio-leds"; > hdd { > label = "IDE Activity"; > - gpios = <&mcu_pio 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > + led-gpios = <&mcu_pio 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > linux,default-trigger = "ide-disk"; > }; > > fault { > - gpios = <&mcu_pio 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + led-gpios = <&mcu_pio 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > /* Keep LED on if BIOS detected hardware fault */ > default-state = "keep"; > }; > @@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ leds { > run-control { > compatible = "gpio-leds"; > red { > - gpios = <&mpc8572 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIHG>; > + led-gpios = <&mpc8572 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIHG>; > default-state = "off"; > }; > green { > - gpios = <&mpc8572 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + led-gpios = <&mpc8572 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > default-state = "on"; > }; > }; > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ leds { > compatible = "gpio-leds"; > > charger-led { > - gpios = <&gpio1 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + led-gpios = <&gpio1 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > linux,default-trigger = "max8903-charger-charging"; > retain-state-suspended; > }; > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c > index 8e5af69..5b7bc84 100644 > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c > @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static struct gpio_leds_priv *gpio_leds_create(struct > platform_device *pdev) > struct gpio_led led = {}; > const char *state = NULL; > > - led.gpiod = devm_get_gpiod_from_child(dev, NULL, child); > + led.gpiod = devm_get_gpiod_from_child(dev, "led", child);
Would not this break existing boards using old bindings? You need to handle both cases: if you can't located "led-gpios" then you will have to try just "gpios". Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/