Hello.
On 01/09/2015 08:21 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Let the core do the checks if HW quirks prevent a transfer. Saves code
from drivers and adds consistency.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index 39d25a8cb1ad..7b10a19abf5b 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -2063,6 +2063,56 @@ module_exit(i2c_exit);
* ----------------------------------------------------
*/
+/* Check if val is exceeding the quirk IFF quirk is non 0 */
+#define i2c_quirk_exceeded(val, quirk) ((quirk) && ((val) > (quirk)))
+
+static int i2c_quirk_error(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msg, char
*err_msg)
+{
+ dev_err(&adap->dev, "quirk: %s (addr 0x%04x, size %u)\n", err_msg,
msg->addr, msg->len);
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
Always returning the same value doesn't make much sense. Are you trying to
save space on the call sites?
[...]
@@ -2080,6 +2130,9 @@ int __i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct
i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
unsigned long orig_jiffies;
int ret, try;
+ if (adap->quirks && i2c_check_for_quirks(adap, msgs, num))
So, you only check for non-zero result of this function? Perhaps it makes
sense to return true/false instead?
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
