On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Octavian Purdila > <octavian.purd...@intel.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila >>> <octavian.purd...@intel.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Use the irq_chip bus_sync_unlock method to update hardware registers >>>> instead of scheduling work from the mask/unmask methods. This simplifies >>>> a bit the driver and make it more uniform with the other GPIO IRQ >>>> drivers. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purd...@intel.com> >>> >>> Patch applied for fixes. >>> >> >> Hi Linus, >> >> I don't see the patch applied, could you please consider it for the >> -for-next branch? > > Ah sorry I thought only the first patch was a critical fix. > Applied this to fixes too now. Working on queueing the > GPIO fixes.
Hi Linus, Its not a critical fix, its just a clean-up. I thought it would go in the the for-next branch (for 3.20) and since I did not see it there I thought it got lost. Sorry for any confusion I may have caused, I am not familiar with the GPIO branch work-flow. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
