On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:22 PM, H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 12:14 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:46:53AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>> Dumb example:
>>>>
>>>> pushq_cfi $__KERNEL_DS /* ss */
>>>>
>>>> This doesn't save anything that the unwinder would care about.
>>>
>>> And? The unwinder or whatever looks at that info simply ignores stuff it
>>> is not interested in, no?
>>
>> But CFI_REL_OFFSET $__KERNEL_DS, 0 probably isn't even well-formed and
>> won't build.
>>
>
> I think this is relatively easy to deal with at the expense of a large
> .ifeq statement in the macro.
>
>
Is the usage you have in mind something like:
pushq_cfi %r11 /* saves r11 */
pushq_cfi $0 /* saves nothing */
pushq_cfi %r11, savereg=rip /* saves rip */
I think I prefer the somewhat less magical:
pushq_reg_cfi %r11 /* saves r11 */
pushq_reg_cfi %r11, savereg=rip /* saves rip */
pushq_nounwind_cfi $0
Or something like that.
--Andy
-hpa
>
>
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
