On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 10:09:18PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:22:18AM +0800, Robin Gong wrote:
>
> > -static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *sdma_prep_slave_sg(
> > - struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> > - unsigned int sg_len, enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> > - unsigned long flags, void *context)
> > +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *sdma_prep_memcpy(
> > + struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dma_dst,
> > + dma_addr_t dma_src, size_t len, unsigned long flags)
> > +{
> > + struct sdma_channel *sdmac = to_sdma_chan(chan);
> > + struct sdma_engine *sdma = sdmac->sdma;
> > + int channel = sdmac->channel;
> > + size_t count;
> > + int i = 0, param, ret;
> > + struct sdma_buffer_descriptor *bd;
> > +
> > + if (!chan || !len || sdmac->status == DMA_IN_PROGRESS)
> > + return NULL;
> why is this dependent on status. You can prepare a descriptor here!
Unfortunately, it is the limitation of imx-sdma driver, the driver can't support
process asynchronously.
> > +
> > + if (len >= NUM_BD * SDMA_BD_MAX_CNT) {
> > + dev_err(sdma->dev, "channel%d: maximum bytes exceeded:%d >
> > %d\n",
> > + channel, len, NUM_BD * SDMA_BD_MAX_CNT);
> > + goto err_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + sdmac->status = DMA_IN_PROGRESS;
> ??
>
> > +
> > + sdmac->buf_tail = 0;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(sdma->dev, "memcpy: %x->%x, len=%d, channel=%d.\n",
> > + dma_src, dma_dst, len, channel);
> > +
> > + sdmac->direction = DMA_MEM_TO_MEM;
> > +
> > + ret = sdma_load_context(sdmac);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_out;
> > +
> > + sdmac->chn_count = 0;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + count = min_t(size_t, len, SDMA_BD_MAX_CNT);
> > + bd = &sdmac->bd[i];
> > + bd->buffer_addr = dma_src;
> > + bd->ext_buffer_addr = dma_dst;
> > + bd->mode.count = count;
> > +
> > + if (sdmac->word_size > DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto err_out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + switch (sdmac->word_size) {
> > + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES:
> So are you dependent of dma_slave_config to be set. Then it is wrong. for
> memcpy you shoudn't be!
>
Yes. Will remove the constrain.
> > switch (sdmac->word_size) {
> > case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES:
> > bd->mode.command = 0;
> > - if (count & 3 || sg->dma_address & 3)
> > + if ((count | sg_src->dma_address | (sg_dst &&
> > + (sg_dst->dma_address))) & 3)
> > return NULL;
> > break;
> > case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES:
> > bd->mode.command = 2;
> > - if (count & 1 || sg->dma_address & 1)
> > + if ((count | sg_src->dma_address |
> > + (sg_dst && (sg_dst->dma_address))) & 1)
> > return NULL;
> this doesn't seem to have anything to do with memcpy, shouldn't this be
> independent change here?
>
Yes, will split the re-org patch clearly.
> > break;
> > case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE:
> > @@ -1099,21 +1214,23 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor
> > *sdma_prep_slave_sg(
> >
> > param = BD_DONE | BD_EXTD | BD_CONT;
> >
> > - if (i + 1 == sg_len) {
> > + if (i + 1 == src_nents) {
> > param |= BD_INTR;
> > param |= BD_LAST;
> > param &= ~BD_CONT;
> > }
> >
> > - dev_dbg(sdma->dev, "entry %d: count: %d dma: %#llx %s%s\n",
> > - i, count, (u64)sg->dma_address,
> > + dev_dbg(sdma->dev, "entry %d: count: %d dma: 0x%08x %s%s\n",
> > + i, count, sg_src->dma_address,
> > param & BD_WRAP ? "wrap" : "",
> > param & BD_INTR ? " intr" : "");
> ditto
>
> >
> > bd->mode.status = param;
> > + if (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_MEM)
> > + sg_dst = sg_next(sg_dst);
> > }
> >
> > - sdmac->num_bd = sg_len;
> > + sdmac->num_bd = src_nents;
> > sdma->channel_control[channel].current_bd_ptr = sdmac->bd_phys;
> >
> > return &sdmac->desc;
> > @@ -1122,6 +1239,24 @@ err_out:
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *sdma_prep_memcpy_sg(
> > + struct dma_chan *chan,
> > + struct scatterlist *dst_sg, unsigned int dst_nents,
> > + struct scatterlist *src_sg, unsigned int src_nents,
> > + unsigned long flags)
> > +{
> > + return sdma_prep_sg(chan, dst_sg, dst_nents, src_sg, src_nents,
> > + DMA_MEM_TO_MEM);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *sdma_prep_slave_sg(
> > + struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> > + unsigned int sg_len, enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> > + unsigned long flags, void *context)
> > +{
> > + return sdma_prep_sg(chan, NULL, 0, sgl, sg_len, direction);
> > +}
> you should have done this first and then added memcpy
>
> --
> ~Vinod
Ok, do the re-org patch firstly, and then add new feature.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
