Hi Jonathan,

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:17:49PM -0800, Jonathan Richardson wrote:
> +     if (of_property_read_u32(np, "scanning_period", &val) >= 0) {
> +             if (val < 1 || val > 256) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "scanning_period must be [1-256]\n");
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             }
> +             priv->cfg_params.scanning_period = val;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_u32(np, "debounce_timeout", &val) >= 0) {
> +             if (val < 0 || val > 255) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "debounce_timeout must be [0-255]\n");
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             }
> +             priv->cfg_params.debounce_timeout = val;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_u32(np, "settling_timeout", &val) >= 0) {
> +             if (val < 0 || val > 11) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "settling_timeout must be [0-11]\n");
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             }
> +             priv->cfg_params.settling_timeout = val;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_u32(np, "touch_timeout", &val) >= 0) {
> +             if (val < 0 || val > 255) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "touch_timeout must be [0-255]\n");
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             }
> +             priv->cfg_params.touch_timeout = val;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_u32(np, "average_data", &val) >= 0) {
> +             if (val < 0 || val > 8) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "average_data must be [0-8]\n");
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             }
> +             priv->cfg_params.average_data = val;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (of_property_read_u32(np, "fifo_threshold", &val) >= 0) {
> +             if (val < 0 || val > 31) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "fifo_threshold must be [0-31]\n");
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             }
> +             priv->cfg_params.fifo_threshold = val;
> +     }

I think these are dveice specific and thus should have "brcm," prefix.

> +
> +     priv->ts_rotation = TS_ROTATION_0;
> +     if (of_property_read_u32(np, "ts-rotation", &val) >= 0) {
> +             priv->ts_rotation = val;
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "ts rotation [%d] degrees\n",
> +                     90 * priv->ts_rotation);
> +     }

This I am not quite sure about - if we want rotation or swap+invert. You
are CCed on another email (tsc2007) that talks about need of generic
touchscreen transforms in input core/of bindings.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to