Hi Masami Hiramatsu,
I can't find this patch and '[PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: checks
kprobes_all_disarmed
in unoptimized_kprobe().' in current mainline. How do these patches get there?
Should they be merged into Russell King's tree first?
Thank you!
On 2015/1/12 20:52, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2015/01/12 21:09), Wang Nan wrote:
>> Original code failed to disarm the probed instruction after
>>
>> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>>
>> if OPTPROBE is enabled.
>>
>> This patch checks kprobes_all_disarmed in unoptimized_kprobe().
>>
>
> Looks good :)
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com>
>
> Thank you!
>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangn...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
>> index 9471710..f16936b 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
>> @@ -630,6 +630,9 @@ static void unoptimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, bool
>> force)
>> {
>> struct optimized_kprobe *op;
>>
>> + if (kprobes_all_disarmed)
>> + return;
>> +
>> if (!kprobe_aggrprobe(p) || kprobe_disarmed(p))
>> return; /* This is not an optprobe nor optimized */
>>
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
