On 01/19/2015, 10:49 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> @@ -322,12 +325,14 @@ static snd_pcm_uframes_t
>>  dummy_systimer_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>>  {
>>      struct dummy_systimer_pcm *dpcm = substream->runtime->private_data;
>> +    unsigned long flags;
>>      snd_pcm_uframes_t pos;
>>  
>> -    spin_lock(&dpcm->lock);
>> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&dpcm->lock, flags);
>>      dummy_systimer_update(dpcm);
>>      pos = dpcm->frac_pos / HZ;
>> -    spin_unlock(&dpcm->lock);
>> +    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dpcm->lock, flags);
>> +
> 
> This chunk is superfluous.  The pointer callback is guaranteed to be
> called in the irq-disabled context.

Oh, my bad, I was looking at snd_compr_ops->pointer which is not the case.

-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to