(2015/01/07 22:40), Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > I think that the patches up to 09/11 inclusive have been though more > that enough review and revisions to think about getting them merged, > there doesn't seem much point in continuously resending them whilst new > features are built on top of them. > > Masami Hiramatsu, are you happy for your patch to generic+X86 kprobes > code [1] to go through the ARM maintainers tree, assuming Russell is > also happy with that. Or should that go via a different route?
Yes, I'm OK to go it through the ARM maintainers tree :) Thank you, > > [1] > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/313218.html > > Wang Nan, assuming everyone is happy, can you put together a branch in a > git repository for those patches, or I'm more than happy to do that if > you like. Then I can give the series a final test and we can send a pull > request to Russell King. > > Thanks all > -- Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/