On Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:33:02 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> Add field offset to struct resource_list_entry to host address space
> translation offset so it could be used to represent bridge resources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang....@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/resource.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> include/linux/acpi.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
> index 16d334a1ee25..54204ac94f8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
> @@ -462,7 +462,8 @@ struct res_proc_context {
> };
>
> static acpi_status acpi_dev_new_resource_entry(struct resource *r,
> - struct res_proc_context *c)
> + struct res_proc_context *c,
> + resource_size_t offset)
> {
> struct resource_list_entry *rentry;
>
> @@ -472,6 +473,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_dev_new_resource_entry(struct
> resource *r,
> return AE_NO_MEMORY;
> }
> rentry->res = *r;
> + rentry->offset = offset;
> list_add_tail(&rentry->node, c->list);
> c->count++;
> return AE_OK;
> @@ -480,6 +482,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_dev_new_resource_entry(struct
> resource *r,
> static acpi_status acpi_dev_process_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> void *context)
> {
> + resource_size_t offset = 0;
> struct res_proc_context *c = context;
> struct resource r;
> int i;
> @@ -500,14 +503,14 @@ static acpi_status acpi_dev_process_resource(struct
> acpi_resource *ares,
>
> if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, &r)
> || acpi_dev_resource_io(ares, &r)
> - || acpi_dev_resource_address_space(ares, &r, NULL)
> - || acpi_dev_resource_ext_address_space(ares, &r, NULL))
> - return acpi_dev_new_resource_entry(&r, c);
> + || acpi_dev_resource_address_space(ares, &r, &offset)
> + || acpi_dev_resource_ext_address_space(ares, &r, &offset))
> + return acpi_dev_new_resource_entry(&r, c, offset);
>
> for (i = 0; acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, i, &r); i++) {
> acpi_status status;
>
> - status = acpi_dev_new_resource_entry(&r, c);
> + status = acpi_dev_new_resource_entry(&r, c, 0);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return status;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index bde8119f5897..fea78e772450 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource
> *ares, int index,
> struct resource_list_entry {
> struct list_head node;
> struct resource res;
> + resource_size_t offset;
Well, so instead of adding the offset thing here and there, wouldn't it be
cleaner to introduce something like
struct ext_resource {
sturct resource res;
resource_size_t offset;
};
and use struct ext_resource instead of struct resource where an offset is
needed?
Just a thought ...
> };
>
> void acpi_dev_free_resource_list(struct list_head *list);
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
