On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Zhang, Yang Z <yang.z.zh...@intel.com> wrote:
> Wincy Van wrote on 2015-01-16:
>> To enable nested apicv support, we need per-cpu vmx control MSRs:
>>   1. If in-kernel irqchip is enabled, we can enable nested
>>      posted interrupt, we should set posted intr bit in the
>>      nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_high. 2. If in-kernel irqchip is disabled,
>>      we can not enable nested posted interrupt, the posted intr bit in
>>      the nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_high will be cleared.
>> Since there would be different settings about in-kernel irqchip
>> between VMs, different nested control MSRs are needed.
>
> I'd suggest you to check irqchip_in_kernel() instead moving the whole ctrl 
> msr to per vcpu.
>

Yes, moving that msrs looks a bit ugly, but the irqchip_in_kernel is
per-VM, not a global
setting, there would be different settings of kernel_irqchip between VMs.
If we use irqchip_in_kernel to check it and set different value of the
ctl msrs, I think it may
be even worse than moving the msrs, because this logic should be a
init function, and this
setting should be converged.

Thanks,

Wincy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to