On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 06:25:41PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Arnd, Olof, Kevin, > > This is another cleanup pull-request for AT91. This one depends on the Device > Tree material that I posted yesterday, so I merged the at91-dt tag just before > stacking up Alexandre's patches. This dependency is needed to make sure that > SRAM gets initialized before using it. > More cleanup will come soon to reach multi-platform. > > Thanks, best regards, > > The following changes since commit eca6f17253f33313eeb3020d0634a60d10f650c4: > > Merge tag 'at91-dt' into at91-3.20-cleanup (2015-01-16 17:18:34 +0100) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nferre/linux-at91.git > tags/at91-cleanup2 > > for you to fetch changes up to 29ee506d0d56f6d39cc237de2512f9cb5629cbf7: > > ARM: at91: move at91rm9200_idle() to clk/at91/pmc.c (2015-01-16 18:08:42 > +0100) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Second batch of cleanup for 3.20: > - By reworking the PM code, we can remove the AT91 more specific > initialization > - We are using DT for SRAM initialization now, so we can remove its explicit > mapping > - The PMC clock driver now hosts IDLE function for at91rm9200 with other > SoCs ones.
This adds a really annoying circular dependency for us. Cleanups are supposed to be the base for other branches, not the other way around. To break the cycle, I've merged this into next/soc instead of into cleanup. We now have a dependency on soc coming after dt, which is also not what we usually do, but it least it's better than putting the dt branch in front of cleanup. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
