On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 12:02 +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: > On 2015/1/21 5:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The patch adds CHT PMC interface. This exposes all the South IP device power > > states and S0ix states for CHT. The bit map of FUNC_DIS and D3_STS_0 > > registers > > for SoCs are consistent. The D3_STS_1 and FUNC_DIS_2 registers, however, are > > not aligned. This is fixed by splitting a common mapping on per register > > basis. > > > Should we define the bit map table completely separate for different > platforms? My concern is, when D3_STS_0 and FUNC_DIS becomes not > consistent in a new SoC, the implementation in this patch has to be > rewritten completely. > > Defining entire bit map table for different platform introduces > reduplicated bit definitions, but when we add a new platform in future, > we don't need to consider the existing platforms definition, and no need > to change code structure any longer. > > Thoughts? >
But this what I did by introducing pmc_reg_map structure per SoC. You may or may not use previous definitions. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@intel.com> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
