> The only evidence I see is a long thread of similar patches from > the last several months, of varying (though not increasing) quality.
I find it acceptable that some of my update suggestions do not fit to your quality expectations at the moment. > Prior objections to your approach were met with a distinct lack > of self-awareness on your part. I guess that a bit more clarification of this view will help to resolve some open issues, won't it? > I don't really see many challenges here to tackle, except for the > social issue of dealing with patch bots like you. I hope that you will like other automatic source code analysis results. > Your automated patches are generally not solving real problems, I try to clean-up Linux source files a bit. Problem solving with a higher value might follow ... > but they are at times introducing bugs. There are the usual different opinions and disagreements which might be still waiting for a constructive solution. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
