hash map is unordered, so get_next_key() iterator shouldn't
rely on particular order of elements. So relax this test.
Fixes: ffb65f27a155 ("bpf: add a testsuite for eBPF maps")
Reported-by: Michael Holzheu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
---
samples/bpf/test_maps.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_maps.c b/samples/bpf/test_maps.c
index e286b42..6299ee9 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/test_maps.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_maps.c
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ static void test_hashmap_sanity(int i, void *data)
/* iterate over two elements */
assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &key, &next_key) == 0 &&
- next_key == 2);
+ (next_key == 1 || next_key == 2));
assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == 0 &&
- next_key == 1);
+ (next_key == 1 || next_key == 2));
assert(bpf_get_next_key(map_fd, &next_key, &next_key) == -1 &&
errno == ENOENT);
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
