Hi Nicholas, On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 23:56 +0800, Gavin Guo wrote: >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger >> <n...@linux-iscsi.org> wrote: >> > Hi Gavin, >> > >> > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 06:38 +0800, Gavin Guo wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> The general protection fault screenshot is attached. >> >> >> >> Summary: >> >> The kernel is Ubuntu-3.13.0-39.66. I've done basic analysis and found >> >> the fault is in list_del of iscsi_del_ts_from_active_list. And it >> >> looks like deleting the iscsi_thread_set *ts two times. The point to >> >> delete including iscsi_get_ts_from_inactive_list, was also checked but >> >> still can't find the clue. Really appreciate if anyone can provide any >> >> idea on the bug. >> >> > > <SNIP> > >> > >> > Thanks for your detailed analysis. >> > >> > A similar bug was reported off-list some months back by a person using >> > iser-target + RoCE export on v3.12.y code. Just to confirm, your >> > environment is using traditional iscsi-target + TCP export, right..? >> >> I am sorry that I'm not an expert of the field and already google RoCE >> on the internet but still don't really know what RoCE is. However, I >> can provide the informations. We used iscsiadm on the initiator side >> and lio_node and tcm_node commands to create the targets for >> connection. I think it should be normal iscsi-target using TCP >> export. >> > > Yep, that would be traditional iscsi-target + TCP export. > >> > >> > At the time, a different set of iser-target related changes ended up >> > avoiding this issue on his particular setup, so we thought it was likely >> > a race triggered by login failures specific to iser-target code. >> > >> > There was a untested patch (included inline below) to drop the legacy >> > active_ts_list usage all-together, but IIRC he was not able to reproduce >> > further so the patch didn't get picked up for mainline. >> > >> > If your able to reliability reproduce, please try with the following >> > patch and let us know your progress. >> >> Thanks for your time reading the mail. I'll let you know the result. > > Just curious, are you able to reliability reproduce this bug in a VM..?
Thanks for your caring, the machine is on the customer side, I've asked and now waiting for their response. > > --nab > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/