On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:34:54AM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:46:20PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Rather than reimplementing the internals of pci_update_resource() it > > may be worth splitting the common stuff out so it gets fixed for both > > pci_update_resource() and pci_enable_device(). > > Just use pci_update_resource(). Problem: pci_update_resource doesn't exist for sparc64. > John, I'd also suggest following changes to the patch: > - move the code to pci_set_power_state(), where it belongs to; > - explicitly check for D3hot->D0 transition *and* for the > No_Soft_Reset bit, to avoid unnecessary config space accesses; > - add a quote from PCI spec (as a comment) explaining why is it needed. I have reformulated the patch to account for these comments, but I am not currently using pci_update_resource for the reason stated above. I'll go ahead and post the new patch for comment. If we can resolve the pci_update_resource issue, I'll post another (either alternative or additional) patch to cover that. Patch to follow... Thanks! John -- John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
