On Monday, January 26, 2015 10:40:24 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> > On 2015/1/22 18:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Can we please stop adding more crap to that notifier thing? I rather
> > > see that go away than being expanded.
> > 
> > Are you referring to FREEZE_PREPARE or remove all of FREEZE staff at all?
> > 
> > What's the disadvantage of adding more notifier?
> 
> clockevents_notify() is not a notifier. Its a multiplex call and I
> want to get rid of it and replace it with explicit functions.

OK, so perhaps we need to move _SUSPEND/_RESUME out of there to start with?

As far as I can say, clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_SUSPEND, NULL) and
clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_RESUME, NULL) are each only called from
one place and moreover, since they are in syscore_ops, we don't need any
locking around them.

So what about the patch below?


---
 include/linux/clockchips.h |    2 --
 kernel/time/clockevents.c  |    9 ---------
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c  |    6 ++++--
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/include/linux/clockchips.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/clockchips.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/clockchips.h
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@ enum clock_event_nofitiers {
        CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_FORCE,
        CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER,
        CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT,
-       CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_SUSPEND,
-       CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_RESUME,
        CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_CPU_DYING,
        CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_CPU_DEAD,
 };
Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/clockevents.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/clockevents.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/time/clockevents.c
@@ -570,15 +570,6 @@ int clockevents_notify(unsigned long rea
                tick_handover_do_timer(arg);
                break;
 
-       case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_SUSPEND:
-               tick_suspend();
-               tick_suspend_broadcast();
-               break;
-
-       case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_RESUME:
-               tick_resume();
-               break;
-
        case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_CPU_DEAD:
                tick_shutdown_broadcast_oneshot(arg);
                tick_shutdown_broadcast(arg);
Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void)
 
        touch_softlockup_watchdog();
 
-       clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_RESUME, NULL);
+       tick_resume();
 
        /* Resume hrtimers */
        hrtimers_resume();
@@ -1299,7 +1299,9 @@ static int timekeeping_suspend(void)
        write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
        raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
 
-       clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_SUSPEND, NULL);
+       tick_suspend();
+       tick_suspend_broadcast();
+
        clocksource_suspend();
        clockevents_suspend();
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to