3.16.7-ckt5 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Roger Quadros <[email protected]>

commit 775a9134f4398ca98a10af8cc3cf9b664017267f upstream.

3430LDP has NAND flash with 32 bytes OOB size which is sufficient to hold
BCH8 codes but the small page check introduced in
commit b491da7233d5 ("mtd: nand: omap: clean-up ecc layout for BCH ecc schemes")
considers anything below 64 bytes unsuitable for BCH4/8/16. There is another
bug in that code where it doesn't skip the check for OMAP_ECC_HAM1_CODE_SW.

Get rid of that small page check code as it is insufficient and redundant
because we are checking for OOB available bytes vs ecc layout before calling
nand_scan_tail().

Fixes: b491da7233d5 ("mtd: nand: omap: clean-up ecc layout for BCH ecc schemes")

Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>
[ luis: backported to 3.16: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
index e2b9b345177a..575a015c8394 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
@@ -1700,13 +1700,6 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                goto return_error;
        }
 
-       /* check for small page devices */
-       if ((mtd->oobsize < 64) && (pdata->ecc_opt != OMAP_ECC_HAM1_CODE_HW)) {
-               pr_err("small page devices are not supported\n");
-               err = -EINVAL;
-               goto return_error;
-       }
-
        /* re-populate low-level callbacks based on xfer modes */
        switch (pdata->xfer_type) {
        case NAND_OMAP_PREFETCH_POLLED:
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to