On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:11:02PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 04:54:22AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > I don't mind opening a never-rebased branch for generic iov_iter-related > > stuff; > > if you prefer to handle it that way - just tell. The first two patches > > from that series would definitely go there; as for the rest... no > > preferences > > here. > > It might make sense to just keep the VFS patches in your tree. > The target ones also are something I'd prefer if it goes through Nic > with additional review. In addition they aren't really critical, > so if you merge the prep patches now we can feed the rest through > the proper trees in the .21 merge window.
Done. The first two are in #iov_iter now (merged into #for-next), the rest is dropped. And #iov_iter is in never-rebased mode, so feel free to pull it wherever you need it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
