> >Yeah I knew there was one, but I thought that was a standalone patch > >(the one turning all bufctl to unsigned long, turning off irqs and > >printing all slabs_full to console), my intention with this was a > >proper /proc entry, something that could be a simple config option. > > > > > > > No, I never wrote a proper /proc interface. But I think the bufctl > approach is the better solution than storing the first 5 entries in the > slab structure: > What if there is a leak on a cache with more than 5 entries per slab?
As slab leaks usually go out of control I think it will be enough to show what is leaking anyway, but you're right on the bufctl approach I think. I may have misundersood the bufctl thing a bit before doing this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/