On Wednesday, December 31, 2014 11:23:26 AM Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:39:32PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, December 22, 2014 07:14:56 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > On 22 December 2014 at 02:44, Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be > > > > populated by the > > > > driver core. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > Generated with coccinelle. SmPL file is in the introductory msg. The big > > > > cleanup was pulled in this merge window. This series catches the bits > > > > fallen > > > > through. The patches shall go in via the subsystem trees. > > > > > > > > drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c | 1 - > > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c > > > > b/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c > > > > index 25fbd6a1374f..f0913eee2f50 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c > > > > @@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ out: > > > > static struct platform_driver ls1x_cpufreq_platdrv = { > > > > .driver = { > > > > .name = "ls1x-cpufreq", > > > > - .owner = THIS_MODULE, > > > > }, > > > > .probe = ls1x_cpufreq_probe, > > > > .remove = ls1x_cpufreq_remove, > > > > > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > > > -- > > > > OK > > > > Wolfram, please feel free to push this through whatever tree you think is > > appropriate. > > I'd prefer if you take it. However, I'll send all leftover ones to Greg, > so you can decide.
I've queued it up for 3.20, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
