On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:33:27AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The current dso cache permits to keep dso->data.fd is open under a
> half of open file limit.  But test__dso_data_cache() sets dso_cnt to
> limit / 2 + 1 so it'll reach the limit in the loop even though the
> loop count is one less than the dso_cnt and it makes the final
> dso__data_fd() after the loop meaningless.
> 
> I guess the intention was dsos[0]->data.fd is open before the last
> open and gets closed after it.  So add an assert before the last open.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>

thanks,
jirka

> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c b/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c
> index caaf37f079b1..22a8c428283a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c
> @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ int test__dso_data_cache(void)
>       limit = nr * 4;
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to set file limit", !set_fd_limit(limit));
>  
> -     /* and this is now our dso open FDs limit + 1 extra */
> -     dso_cnt = limit / 2 + 1;
> +     /* and this is now our dso open FDs limit */
> +     dso_cnt = limit / 2;
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to create dsos\n",
>               !dsos__create(dso_cnt, TEST_FILE_SIZE));
>  
> @@ -268,7 +268,10 @@ int test__dso_data_cache(void)
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     /* open +1 dso over the allowed limit */
> +     /* verify the first one is already open */
> +     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("dsos[0] is not open", dsos[0]->data.fd != -1);
> +
> +     /* open +1 dso to reach the allowed limit */
>       fd = dso__data_fd(dsos[i], &machine);
>       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to get fd", fd > 0);
>  
> -- 
> 2.2.2
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to