It'd be nice to see the cover for this series so that people know the
reason behind this change is.  Maybe it'd be a good idea to add a
pointer or some description below the "---" to such patches which
are otherwise totally meaningless to the people you add to the Cc
line?

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 04:43:12PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> We would want to use number of page table level to define mm_struct.
> Let's expose it as CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 4211507e2bca..d7dca652573f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -286,6 +286,11 @@ config GENERIC_BUG
>       def_bool y
>       depends on BUG
>  
> +config PGTABLE_LEVELS
> +     int
> +     default 3 if ARM_LPAE
> +     default 2
> +
>  source "init/Kconfig"
>  
>  source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to