Ted, On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 09:02:30PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 07:40:51PM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote: > > [...] > > Thanks for the bug report. I was able to reproduce the problem, and > found the problem. Unfortunately I accidentally introduce this in my > most recent patchset. I'll fix it up, but here is the patch until I > get the a new version pushed out. > > diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c > index 82c2984..0046861 100644 > --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c > +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c > @@ -1192,9 +1192,9 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) > > trace_writeback_dirty_inode(inode, flags); > } > - dirtytime = flags & I_DIRTY_TIME; > if (flags & I_DIRTY_INODE) > flags &= ~I_DIRTY_TIME; > + dirtytime = flags & I_DIRTY_TIME; > > /* > * Paired with smp_mb() in __writeback_single_inode() for the > > - Ted
That solved the problem. Thanks for the quick fix. -- - Jeremiah Mahler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
