On Sunday 10 July 2005 20:01, Ed Cogburn wrote: > Jim Crilly wrote: > > > But in most of the changesets on the bkbits site you can go back over 2 > > years and not see anything from namesys people. Nearly all of the fixes > > commited in the past 2-3 years are from SuSe.
With Chris Mason's name attached? Chris wrote the journaling support for R3 and worked for SUSE for a while (he may still?). I also remember seeing quite a few patches run though the reiser mailing list for comment... > So, for the sake of argument, if IBM were to drop official support for JFS, > we'd yank JFS out of the kernel even if there was someone else willing to > support it? Why does it now *matter* who supports it, as long as its being > maintained? And will we now block IBM's hypothetical JFS2 from the kernel > if IBM, from the programmers up to the CEO, doesn't swear on their momma's > grave that they'll continue to support JFS1, even if JFS1 is being > supported by others? Jeez, this is why it doesn't take a kernel dev to see > the problems here, common sense seems to be an increasingly rare ingredient > in these arguments against R4. If I didn't know better, I'd think you were > making this stuff up as you went along.... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/