Hi Sergei, On Wednesday 04 February 2015 16:31:29 Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 02/04/2015 03:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Anyone may call clk_round_rate() with a zero rate value, so we have to > > protect against that. > > Shouldn't this be checked and fixed up in clk_round_rate() then?
Not all implementations need to divide by the requested rate, so I don't think a check in the core is the best solution. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be> -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
