We would want to use number of page table level to define mm_struct.
Let's expose it as CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetc...@ezchip.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>
---

I've implemented accounting for pmd page tables as we have for pte (see
mm->nr_ptes). It's requires a new counter in mm_struct: mm->nr_pmds.

But the feature doesn't make any sense if an architecture has PMD level
folded and it would be nice get rid of the counter in this case.

The problem is that we cannot use __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED in
<linux/mm_types.h> due to circular dependencies:

<linux/mm_types> -> <asm/pgtable.h> -> <linux/mm_types.h>

In most cases <asm/pgtable.h> wants <linux/mm_types.h> to get definition
of struct page and struct vm_area_struct. I've tried to split mm_struct
into separate header file to be able to user <asm/pgtable.h> there.

But it doesn't fly on some architectures, like ARM: it wants mm_struct
<asm/pgtable.h> to implement tlb flushing. I don't see how to fix it without
massive de-inlining or coverting a lot for inline functions to macros.

This is other approach: expose number of page tables in use via Kconfig
and use it in <linux/mm_types.h> instead of __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED from
<asm/pgtable.h>.

---
 arch/tile/Kconfig | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/tile/Kconfig b/arch/tile/Kconfig
index 7cca41842a9e..0142d578b5a8 100644
--- a/arch/tile/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/tile/Kconfig
@@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ config ARCH_DEFCONFIG
        default "arch/tile/configs/tilepro_defconfig" if !TILEGX
        default "arch/tile/configs/tilegx_defconfig" if TILEGX
 
+config PGTABLE_LEVELS
+       int
+       default 3 if 64BIT
+       default 2
+
 source "init/Kconfig"
 
 source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to