From: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
It is not clear why the "else" branch clears ->fpu_counter, this makes
no sense.
If use_eager_fpu() then this has no effect. Otherwise, if we actually
wanted to prevent fpu preload after the context switch we would need to
reset it unconditionally, even if __thread_has_fpu().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/i387.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
index 47348653503a..c3b92c0975cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
@@ -122,8 +122,7 @@ void unlazy_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (__thread_has_fpu(tsk)) {
__save_init_fpu(tsk);
__thread_fpu_end(tsk);
- } else
- tsk->thread.fpu_counter = 0;
+ }
preempt_enable();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlazy_fpu);
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
