On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:53:55PM -0600, ttha...@opensource.altera.com wrote:
> +static int altr_edac_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct edac_device_ctl_info *dci;
> + struct altr_edac_device_dev *drvdata;
> + struct resource *r;
> + int res = 0;
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + char *ecc_name = (char *)np->name;
> + static int dev_instance;
> +
> + if (!devres_open_group(&pdev->dev, NULL, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> + "Unable to open devm\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
Why are you opening a devres group here? The device model already opens
a devres group ready for the ->probe callback, which is released when
the device is unbound... hmm, see below though...
> +
> + r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + if (!r) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> + "Unable to get mem resource\n");
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
Why EPROBE_DEFER for a missing resource?
> + }
> +
> + if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, r->start, resource_size(r),
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev))) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> + "%s:Error requesting mem region\n", ecc_name);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + dci = edac_device_alloc_ctl_info(sizeof(*drvdata), ecc_name,
> + 1, ecc_name, 1, 0, NULL, 0,
> + dev_instance++);
> +
> + if (!dci) {
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> + "%s: Unable to allocate EDAC device\n", ecc_name);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + drvdata = dci->pvt_info;
> + dci->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dci);
> + drvdata->edac_dev_name = ecc_name;
> +
> + drvdata->base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, r->start, resource_size(r));
> + if (!drvdata->base)
> + goto err;
You could use devm_ioremap_resource() to simplify the mapping, resource
allocation and resource error handling.
> +
> + /* Get driver specific data for this EDAC device */
> + drvdata->data = of_match_node(altr_edac_device_of_match, np)->data;
> +
> + /* Check specific dependencies for the module */
> + if (drvdata->data->setup) {
> + res = drvdata->data->setup(pdev, drvdata->base);
> + if (res < 0)
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + drvdata->sb_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, drvdata->sb_irq,
> + altr_edac_device_handler,
> + 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), dci);
> + if (res < 0)
> + goto err;
> +
> + drvdata->db_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> + res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, drvdata->db_irq,
> + altr_edac_device_handler,
> + 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), dci);
> + if (res < 0)
> + goto err;
> +
> + dci->mod_name = "Altera EDAC Memory";
> + dci->dev_name = drvdata->edac_dev_name;
> +
> + altr_set_sysfs_attr(dci, drvdata->data);
> +
> + if (edac_device_add_device(dci))
> + goto err;
> +
> + devres_close_group(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +
> + return 0;
> +err:
> + edac_printk(KERN_ERR, EDAC_DEVICE,
> + "%s:Error setting up EDAC device: %d\n", ecc_name, res);
> + devres_release_group(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + edac_device_free_ctl_info(dci);
Hmm, I guess this is why you're using devm groups - it seems like
edac allocation/freeing needs to be improved to work cooperatively
with devm_* APIs rather than having to add devm group complexity
into drivers.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
