* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > might be an incorrect printout of stack_left :( The esp looks more or
> > less normal. Not sure why it printed -52.
>
> here's the stack_left calculation:
>
> + printk("ds: %04x es: %04x ss: %04x preempt: %08x\n",
> + regs->xds & 0xffff, regs->xes & 0xffff, ss, preempt_count());
> + printk("Process %s (pid: %d, threadinfo=%p task=%p stack_left=%ld
> worst_left=%ld)",
> + current->comm, current->pid, current_thread_info(), current,
> + (regs->esp & (THREAD_SIZE-1))-sizeof(struct thread_info),
> + worst_stack_left);
>
> i cannot see anything wrong in it, [...]
that should be "esp", not "regs->esp". regs->esp is something different
upon in-kernel faults. I've uploaded -27 with the fix - but it should
only confirm that it's not a stack overflow.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
