On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 04:47:07PM +0800, huang ying wrote: > There are no distinguishable difference between the parent and the child > for hackbench throughput number. > > Usually you will not consider statistics such as involuntary context > switches?
Only if there's a 'problem' with the primary performance metric (total runtime in case of hackbench). Once the primary metric shifts, you go look at what the cause of this change might be, at that point things like # context switches etc.. are interesting. As long as the primary performance metric is stable, meh. As such; I would suggest _always_ reporting the primary metric for each benchmark, preferably on top and not hidden somewhere in the mass of numbers. I now had to very carefully waste a few minutes of my time reading those numbers to see if there was anything useful in; there wasn't. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
