Greg KH wrote: > Based on the proposed users of this fs, I don't see any. What ones are > you saying are not "debug" type operations? And yes, I consider LTT a > "debug" type operation :) > > The best part of this, is it gives distros and users a consistant place > to mount the fs, and to know where this kind of thing shows up in the fs > namespace.
Except that relayfs contains files that all behave in a very specific way: as relayfs buffers, while debugfs may contain a variety of different types of files. I kind'a see what you're trying to say, and I fully understand that some debugfs users may indeed use the relayfs fileops to add an entry in debugfs which serves as a buffer, and that's the very reason we exported them to boot. But there's something to be said about having a single filesystem (and therefore tree somewhere in /) which contains entries dedicated to a single purpose: dump huge amounts of data out of the kernel and into userspace whether or not the system is being debuged. >From a user point of view, it sounds awfully weird if they're using "debugfs" on a production system ... > Last I looked, this was not possible. Has this changed in the latest > version? Here's from 2.6.13-rc2-mm1 fs/relayfs/inode.c > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(relayfs_open); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(relayfs_poll); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(relayfs_mmap); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(relayfs_release); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(relayfs_file_operations); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(relayfs_create_dir); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(relayfs_remove_dir); It's been there ever since you've asked for it earlier this year :) Karim -- Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits http://www.opersys.com || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || 1-866-677-4546 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/