On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:02:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 10:10 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >         chip->clk = devm_clk_get(chip->dev, "hclk");
> > > -       if (IS_ERR(chip->clk))
> > > -               return PTR_ERR(chip->clk);
> > > +       if (IS_ERR(chip->clk)) {
> > > +               if (PTR_ERR(chip->clk) == -ENOENT)
> > > +                       chip->clk = NULL;
> > 
> > You don't need to set it to NULL, if CONFIG_HAVE_CLK isn't set
> > the dummy routines would take care of it.
> 
> Yeah, but in our case we have CONFIG_HAVE_CLK=y and no clk is provided
> since IP is clockless. What could you suggest to do in such case?

        chip->clk = devm_clk_get(chip->dev, "hclk");
        if (IS_ERR(chip->clk) && PTR_ERR(chip->clk) != -ENOENT)
                return PTR_ERR(chip->clk);

You can then test for the presence of a clk via IS_ERR(chip->clk).

I'm just debating whether we should add a clk_is_valid() inline function
to linux/clk.h to avoid these shouting tests, and make it easier for
people test this in a generic manner.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to